Entries by halyard

Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 2/9/24

As expected, with the light economic data calendar, volatility driven by data this week was nearly nonexistent. Instead of trading on economic data, traders focused on the plethora of Fed member speeches, 15 of them, with a Fed speaker hitting the tape every day this week. The message was consistent, reflecting Chairman Powell’s comments that the Fed is likely to cut rates this year, but not imminently. There was also some limited discussion about the effect seasonality could have played in the outsized January employment report. The problem with that discussion is that they don’t want to call the integrity of government reporting into question for many reasons. The primary one being if the data is flawed and they are making decision on flawed data then, inherently, the decision is flawed. As the rates market realized that the Fed might not be as early and as aggressive as it thought, yields rose with the intermediate sector of the yield curve suffering the largest increase.

Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 2/2/24

The January employment report was nothing short of a shocker. The estimate was for 185,000 new jobs, and the whisper was closer to 125,000 after the Wednesday release of the ADP report showing a gain of only 107,000 jobs. Instead, the BLS reported that 353,000 new jobs were created in January and the jobs figure for December was revised up to 317,000. Collective thinking prior to Friday had been that the Fed had gone too far with their rate hikes and the U.S. was teetering on the verge of a recession. To be clear, that was not our opinion. Retailers enjoyed a strong holiday selling season, consumer confidence has bounced back, the unemployment rate is close to an all-time low, and the S&P 500 just hit an all-time high. With the employment report the expectation that the Fed will cut rates in March has been obliterated. In fact, the Fed shouldn’t be considering a rate cut anytime soon. If anything, the 4.5% year-over-year rise in average hourly income is likely to contribute further to the inflationary uptick.

Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 1/26/24

Three years ago, the watchword was “transitory inflation;” that was followed last year by “higher for longer.” On the back of the Fed’s communication that they expect to cut rates three times this year, the new watch word on the street is “wait and see.” The reason for the uncertainty is the moderation the economy has displayed. Inflation has drifted lower, the jobs market remains robust, and consumers continue to consume. In short, the economy appears to be in equilibrium. Given that circumstance, the Fed should not be in a hurry to cut rates. Except that the real estate market is being negatively impacted by relatively high interest rates. The residential market is clearly being hampered by high mortgage rates, but the concurrent shortage of inventory has prevented a collapse of home prices. But commercial real estate is not enjoying the same dynamic. In addition to higher borrowing rates, commercial real estate continues to be challenged by the hangover of the COVID-related work from home mentality. While lower rates would help offset some of the expense of excess office space, we expect that the sector is in the early days of a years-long retrenchment.

Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 1/19/24

At the close of trading last Friday, the street thinking was that the Fed would cut rates at the March meeting and that there would be at least three additional rate cuts this year. By Tuesday, that conclusion was being reassessed and the selling has been relentless. The 5-year Treasury is closing the week at 4.06%, up nearly 30 basis points from last Friday’s close. The initial catalyst for the move was Federal Reserve Governor Chris Waller’s comments on Tuesday morning that suggested that the Fed would be careful and deliberate in cutting rates this year which contradicted the opinion that the cuts would come soon and at every other meeting.

Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 1/12/24

Communicating that they expected three 25 basis point rate cuts this year, the open market committee members convinced bond buyers that all was well and to expect inflation to continue to fall as the year progressed. Then the December inflation reports were released. On Thursday the consumer price index, year-over-year, reversed course and ticked up to 3.4%, up from the 3.1% recorded last month. The expectation was that it would rise 0.1%. On the same morning, the lesser-followed Atlanta Fed wage tracker, a measure of aggregate wages, ticked up to 5.4% year-over-year from the 5.1% recorded in November. Those measures indicate that consumers are still “paying up” to consume and are demanding higher wages to keep pace with rising prices. That result is going to make it difficult for the Fed to cut the overnight rate at the March FOMC meeting. That meeting is scheduled for March 20th, giving the Fed two more inflation reports to examine. But, given the Fed’s newfound credibility as an inflation-fighter, we think the committee will be unwilling to cut rates while inflation is still a problem.

Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 1/5/24

The first week of the new year had been a quiet one until the employment report was released this morning. The headline non-farm payrolls surprised to the upside, with 216,000 new jobs added to the workforce, and the unemployment rate falling to 3.7%. At first glance the report was a solid one and the bond market immediately sold off. However, digging into the details revealed that it was not as robust as the headline suggested. Glaringly, household employment fell 683,000; the biggest drop since April 2020 when COVID crushed employment for much of the workforce. It’s not unusual for the non-farm and the household reports to deviate, but an 899,000 deviation leads us to conclude that one or the other will be significantly revised. Later this morning, the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported a sharp drop in their services employment survey. Again, the drop was the sharpest since April 2020. Investors seem to have interpreted the combined reports as offering a solid backdrop for the Fed’s plan to cut rates this year.

Halyard’s Year End Wrap – 12/31/23

It’s been a remarkable year in the capital markets! Last December, year-over-year consumer price inflation was running 6.5% and the Federal Reserve was solidly in “higher for longer” mode with the committee prepared to continue to raise rates to quell inflation. The ten-year Treasury opened 2023 yielding 4.48%, ticked up to a high of 4.65% early in the year, before ultimately settling at 3.88%. The Fed communication has changed dramatically in the last 12 months. They dropped the higher for longer mantra this month, instead communicating that they anticipate three rate cuts in the coming year. Let’s hope they’re not premature in their abrupt policy change. By several measures, the economy continues to run hot, especially employment. It has become clear that there’s a worker shortage in the United States. The unemployment rate in November was 3.7%, just above the all-time low. The Fed usually doesn’t cut rates when unemployment is near a cycle low. But this Fed has proved that they have no interest in any rules-based policy.

Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 12/22/23

The Euphoria from last week’s news that the Fed was done raising interest rates and expects to cut rates by 75 basis points next year continued into this week. In anticipation of those cuts, the entire yield curve has priced approximately 100 basis points lower. The knock-on effects can be found almost everywhere; the S&P 500 is less than 1.0% off an all-time high, mortgage rates are back below 7.0%, and consumer confidence as measured by the Conference Board’s present situation index is skyrocketing. But we wonder if that euphoria is unwarranted. After all, the move lower in rates is an easing of financial conditions, coming while year-over-year core CPI is 4% and pressure for higher wages is unrelenting.

February 2024 – Monthly Commentary

One must wonder if the Federal Reserve is deliberately trying to mislead fixed income managers. It certainly seems that way. In 2022, when inflation warning signs were flashing everywhere, the committee maintained their expansionary, zero percent interest rate policy. Their response to the alarming pace of inflation was that it would prove transitory, and that inflation would soon return to the sub-2% trend. The fixed income community, believing the Fed possessed superior knowledge, extended duration to lock in the higher interest rates of the then upwardly sloping yield curve. After months of insisting that that the rise in inflation was transitory, the Committee realized that they had been wrong, and inflation was becoming entrenched in the minds of consumers. Upon that realization, the committee reacted by raising the overnight interest rate 500 basis points over the subsequent 16 months, causing the economy to wobble, and grinding the housing market to a near halt. That sharp move higher in the overnight rate pulled the entire yield curve higher as well, resulting in sharp losses to intermediate fixed income investors.

January 2024 – Monthly Commentary

With February upon us it may seem odd to revisit the December open market meeting, but the January employment report and the recent 60 Minutes interview of Chairman Powell has us wondering, “what were they thinking?” What we refer to was the dot-plot indicating three rate cuts this year. We’ve never been in favor of the Fed publicly forecasting their expected course of action and this is exactly why. After leaving the overnight rate unchanged for two consecutive meetings, bond investors assumed by their lack of action that they were probably done with the rate hikes. But rate cuts weren’t really on anyone’s radar. Speculation started to creep into the market in November as managers anticipated that we had reached the peak in rates, but the Fed’s communication caused a sharp drop in interest rates across the yield curve. That narrative unleashed a torrent of buying that sent the 5-year note from just a shade under 5% all the way down to 3.8%.