As expected, with the light economic data calendar, volatility driven by data this week was nearly nonexistent. Instead of trading on economic data, traders focused on the plethora of Fed member speeches, 15 of them, with a Fed speaker hitting the tape every day this week. The message was consistent, reflecting Chairman Powell’s comments that the Fed is likely to cut rates this year, but not imminently. There was also some limited discussion about the effect seasonality could have played in the outsized January employment report. The problem with that discussion is that they don’t want to call the integrity of government reporting into question for many reasons. The primary one being if the data is flawed and they are making decision on flawed data then, inherently, the decision is flawed. As the rates market realized that the Fed might not be as early and as aggressive as it thought, yields rose with the intermediate sector of the yield curve suffering the largest increase.

Three years ago, the watchword was “transitory inflation;” that was followed last year by “higher for longer.” On the back of the Fed’s communication that they expect to cut rates three times this year, the new watch word on the street is “wait and see.” The reason for the uncertainty is the moderation the economy has displayed. Inflation has drifted lower, the jobs market remains robust, and consumers continue to consume. In short, the economy appears to be in equilibrium. Given that circumstance, the Fed should not be in a hurry to cut rates. Except that the real estate market is being negatively impacted by relatively high interest rates. The residential market is clearly being hampered by high mortgage rates, but the concurrent shortage of inventory has prevented a collapse of home prices. But commercial real estate is not enjoying the same dynamic. In addition to higher borrowing rates, commercial real estate continues to be challenged by the hangover of the COVID-related work from home mentality. While lower rates would help offset some of the expense of excess office space, we expect that the sector is in the early days of a years-long retrenchment.

Communicating that they expected three 25 basis point rate cuts this year, the open market committee members convinced bond buyers that all was well and to expect inflation to continue to fall as the year progressed. Then the December inflation reports were released. On Thursday the consumer price index, year-over-year, reversed course and ticked up to 3.4%, up from the 3.1% recorded last month. The expectation was that it would rise 0.1%. On the same morning, the lesser-followed Atlanta Fed wage tracker, a measure of aggregate wages, ticked up to 5.4% year-over-year from the 5.1% recorded in November. Those measures indicate that consumers are still “paying up” to consume and are demanding higher wages to keep pace with rising prices. That result is going to make it difficult for the Fed to cut the overnight rate at the March FOMC meeting. That meeting is scheduled for March 20th, giving the Fed two more inflation reports to examine. But, given the Fed’s newfound credibility as an inflation-fighter, we think the committee will be unwilling to cut rates while inflation is still a problem.