Halyard’s Weekly Wrap
our thoughts on the past week’s market activity, economic releases, and Federal Reserve commentary
our thoughts on the past week’s market activity, economic releases, and Federal Reserve commentary
07/31/26 –
At the post-FOMC press conference Kevin Warsh surprised investors with his lack of commitment, either hawkish or dovish, in his comments to reporters. Since assuming the role as chairman two months ago, his comments have been decidedly hawkish. In an unofficial survey prior to the meeting about 20% of those surveyed were expecting a surprise rate hike. Warsh has mentioned on numerous occasions that inflation was running too hot for his liking. Despite those public comments there were only 3 members of the committee that voted for a rate hike.
In his press conference he made several contradicting statements that left everyone a bit confused. Specifically, when asked if the recent rise interest rates was an indicator that the Fed should raise the overnight rate, he “waffled” and suggested that it was in response to better than expected economic news of late. When asked about the next move in rates he completely demurred, which left the questioners, and us, a bit baffled. He has explicitly said that he intends to use the overnight rate as the primary policy tool, but if he’s of the opinion that inflation is too high, then the overnight rate is too low.
Bond investors initially cheered with the 2-year note rallying to close the day at 4.27% after touching 4.32% earlier in the morning. The market is giving some of that back, with the 2-year/30-year yield curve closing the week at 99 basis points, 10 bps wider than where it was earlier in the week.
With so much focus on the Fed, the headline advance GDP report was largely ignored. The Bureau of Economic Analysis estimates that Q2 GDP grew at a l.5% annualized rate, materially below the 2.0% expectation. However a closer look at the underlying details softens the headline number. Private domestic final purchases (PDFP), the cleanest look at how much Americans are buying, rose to 3.9% over the first quarter. The difference between the total GDP and the PDFP was mainly attributable to the widening trade deficit and inventory destocking detracting from growth.
Released along with GDP was the inflation component of the report. That showed that core PCE price index rose 3.4% annualized, down from 4.4% recorded in Q1, but still above the 2% target quoted by the FOMC.
Next week brings the employment report for July. The consensus is expecting the BLS to show that 86,000 new jobs were added in the month, better than the 57,000 added in June but slightly below the 3-month average of 98,600.
This commentary is being provided by Halyard Asset Management, L.L.C. and its affiliates (collectively “Halyard” or “we”) for informational and discussion purposes only and does not constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice, or a recommendation with respect to the securities used, or an offer or solicitation, and is not the basis for any contract to purchase or sell any security, or other instrument, or for Halyard to enter into or arrange any type of transaction as a consequence of any information contained herein. Although the information herein has been obtained from public and private sources and data that we believe to be reliable, we make no representation as its accuracy or completeness. The views expressed herein represent the opinions of Halyard Asset Management, LLC, or any of its affiliates, and are not intended as a forecast or guarantee of future results. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
399 Knollwood Road
Suite 107B
White Plains, NY 10603

Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 10/6/23
/in Weekly Wrap/by halyardWay back in July we wrote that the BLS non-farm payroll report told a far different story than the private ADP employment report, with the former quadrupling the latter. That situation has risen again, only in reverse. The ADP report showed tepid job growth of 89,000 in September while the BLS reported 336,000 for the period, double the number expected. Moreover, the revision of the prior two months added another 119,000 jobs to the economy. While excellent news for the economy it’s likely to put another Fed rate hike back into play at the November 1st meeting. That may not be necessary as Former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion article this week. He points out that while the Fed Funds rate is 0.5% higher since mid-May, the 10-year note yield, which is the benchmark for mortgage rates and corporate borrowing is 1.4% higher, and that is going to cause a significant bite to the economy. We whole-heartedly agree that both are going to slow the economy. Warsh correctly states that the 10-year is the benchmark for housing, but the short-term rate is the benchmark for bank debt, which typically is lower rated and carries a floating rate; to put it plainly, rising short rates are hurting lower-rated credits.
Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 9/29/23
/in Weekly Wrap/by halyardBonds were under intense selling pressure for most of this week in what could only be described as a delayed reaction to the “higher for longer” message delivered by Chairman Powell last week. The old 2-year note (August 2025 maturity) traded as high as 5.19% before closing the week at 5.11%. The 2-year/30-year yield spread continues to dis-invert, closing the week at -35 basis points.
With the rise in rates, the average mortgage rate hit a 23-year high of 7.31%, up from last week’s high of 7.19%. The rise in the cost of financing a home will offer no solace to the beleaguered housing market.
Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 9/22/23
/in Weekly Wrap/by halyardThe FOMC left the Fed Funds lending rate unchanged, as was widely expected, and hinted there could be one more rate hike later this year. According to their interest rate graphic, the DOT plot, the committee anticipates another 0.25% rate hike later this year followed by a 0.50% rate cut in 2024. However next year’s expectation is the median forecast with committee members’ expectations running from 4.5% to 5.75%. The individual forecasts for 2025 are even more dispersed, ranging from 3.0% to 5.75%. In short, “higher for longer!” At the post-meeting press conference Chairman Powell was upbeat on the current state of the economy which leads us to conclude that he has become one of the more hawkish committee members.
Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 9/15/23
/in Weekly Wrap/by halyardWe wrote last week that the release of the consumer and producer price indices, retail sales and the Michigan surveys would be a litmus test for the Fed’s rate decision later this month. Unfortunately, the releases had a little something for everyone and didn’t offer definitive visibility on the outcome of next week’s FOMC meeting.
As expected, consumer prices rose in August, rising more than consensus expectation. The year-over-year measure of CPI registered 3.7%, up from 3.2% last month, but the core CPI for the same period fell from 4.7% to 4.3%. That’s far from the Fed’s 2% target but the anecdotal slowing in the economy is likely enough to keep the Fed on the sidelines at the September 20th FOMC meeting, but not enough call the current monetary policy the peak
Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 9/8/23
/in Weekly Wrap/by halyardToday we’ll look to the coming week, instead at the conclusion of the weekly wrap. The release of the consumer and producer price indices, retail sales and the Michigan surveys will be a litmus test for the Fed’s rate decision later this month. Comments from committee members seem to indicate that they will hold rates steady, but CPI and retail sales could prove problematic to that view. Recall that last month retail sales spiked, and many attributed the uptick to the Amazon prime-day sales. As such economists are looking for a month-over-month change of 0.1%. Anecdotally though, contemporaneous measures indicated that retailing continued to hum which could result in an above expectation result. More of a concern though is CPI. In June, the year-over-year measure plunged from 4.0% to 3.0%, giving the Fed some comfort that policy was moving in the right direction. Then the measure ticked up to 3.2% in July. Not a happy outcome but tolerable given that core inflation remained subdued. A similar outcome is expected next week, only economists are forecasting the YOY measure to tick up to an indefensible 3.6%. Rising energy costs will be the culprit but that’s not going to matter to consumers. The fact remains, the cost of filling the gas tank continues to hit our wallets.
Halyard’s Weekly Wrap – 9/1/23
/in Weekly Wrap/by halyardDespite the muted volatility of the last unofficial week of summer, economic data released this week will likely keep the Fed on the sidelines later this month. The data was heavily focused on the labor market and the releases show a slowing in hiring. The Job openings measure (JOLTS) has plunged in the last wo months, falling from 9.6 million available and unfilled jobs to 8.8 million and well below the 12 million unfilled jobs touched last spring. Simultaneous with the JOLTS release, the conference board consumer confidence index fell from 114.0 to 106.1 as the uptick in confidence witnessed last month vanished.